Meta AnalysisID 6098
11种治疗策略对不稳定型心绞痛患者的临床疗效与安全性：一项网状Meta分析
CRD42021229852
1. How effective are the 11 common therapeutic strategies for unstable angina pectoris in China? 2. Among the 11 therapeutic strategies commonly used to treat unstable angina pectoris, which one is more recommended?
Relationship Network
Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.
Click a node to open it in a new tab
Formula: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...
Record Fields
Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.
- Meta Analysis Id
- 6098
- Evidence Id
- 14656
- Core Evidence Id
- 14656
- Source Meta Analysis Id
- 6080
- Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
- HBMA006080
- Crd Id
- CRD42021229852
- Title
- The Clinical Efficacy And Safety of 11 Therapeutic Strategies in Patients with Unstable Angina Pectoris: A Network Meta-Analysis
- Review Question
- 1. How effective are the 11 common therapeutic strategies for unstable angina pectoris in China? 2. Among the 11 therapeutic strategies commonly used to treat unstable angina pectoris, which one is more recommended?
- Study Type Included
- Inclusion criteria: (1) Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and semi-randomized controlled trials of all drug treatments. (2) Patients with unstable angina pectoris diagnosed according to established diagnostic criteria. (3) There are no restrictions on the gender and age of patients. (4) The document language is not restricted. Exclusion criteria: (1) Duplicate files. (2) The research includes incomplete or incorrect data. (3) Animal experiments. (4) Review the literature.
- Condition Being Studied
- Adults with unstable angina and improvement of heart function. At present, more and more treatment strategies are used to treat unstable angina, but it is not clear which strategy is the best. At present, a systematic review and meta-analysis of drugs used to treat unstable angina have been carried out. Traditional meta-analysis only provides a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the two treatments, but a variety of treatment strategies are used in clinical practice. Therefore, these traditional meta-analysis results cannot meet current clinical needs. It is especially important to compare the effectiveness and safety of multiple interventions immediately. Therefore, this study will use the network meta-analysis method to compare multiple interventions, and rank various interventions according to the degree of improvement of each efficacy indicator.
- Participant
- Animal
- Human Disease Modelled
- Intervention
- Some drugs commonly used to treat unstable angina pectoris. These drugs include: Di'ao Xinxuekang Capsules, aspirin, compound Danshen dripping pills, atorvastatin, low molecular weight heparin, Tongxinluo capsules, clopidogrel, ticagrelor.
- Comparator Control
- Control group: drug treatment (for example: aspirin); treatment as usual (diabetic-lowering drugs, nitrate drugs, and β-blockers)
- Main Outcome
- Total effective rate
- Outcome Measure
- Additional Outcome
- Study Method
- Network meta-analysis, Systematic review
- Keyword
- Angina, Unstable; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome
- Contact
- Organisational Affiliation
- Funding Source
- Other Selection Criteria
- Final Publication
- Same Topic Review
- Published Protocol
- Review Type
- Language
- English
- Country
- China
- Review Stage
- First Submission Date
- Registration Date
- 2021-02-07
- Anticipated Start Date
- 2020-12-31
- Anticipated Completion Date
- 2021-04-01
- Title Cn
- 11种治疗策略对不稳定型心绞痛患者的临床疗效与安全性：一项网状Meta分析
- Title En
- The Clinical Efficacy And Safety of 11 Therapeutic Strategies in Patients with Unstable Angina Pectoris: A Network Meta-Analysis
- Bilingual Status
- complete