Meta AnalysisID 941

院外心脏骤停静脉与骨内肾上腺素的比较:Meta分析

CRD42020183961

The present study investigated whether intravenous and intraosseous adrenaline administration lead to different outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Back to Browse

Relationship Network

Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.

Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...

Record Fields

Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.

Meta Analysis Id
941
Evidence Id
9499
Core Evidence Id
9499
Source Meta Analysis Id
914
Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
HBMA000914
Crd Id
CRD42020183961
Title
Intravenous versus intraosseous adrenaline administration in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis
Review Question
The present study investigated whether intravenous and intraosseous adrenaline administration lead to different outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Study Type Included
Studies were considered eligible if they met the following criteria: (1) Studies that focused on intravenous versus intraosseous adrenaline administration in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and (2) studies with complete information for the assessment of odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In cases where there was overlap of the study population or enrollment period in articles published by the same investigators, the article with the greatest number of patients was used for the analysis. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies published repeatedly; (2) reviews, conference abstracts, letter, or case reports; and (3) studies without available data for statistics.
Condition Being Studied
Out-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are a major public health concern and a leading cause of death worldwide. More than 350 000 individuals in North America and 275 000 individuals in Europe experience OHCAs annually, and only 10 % of patients who suffer from OHCA survive to discharge. Survival of patients with cardiac arrest, particularly out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, depends on quick and high-quality administration of CPR. Epinephrine is the primary drug administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to reverse cardiac arrest, and early administration of epinephrine is associated with a higher probability of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). In the current guidelines, intraosseous is recommended as a rescue device if iv access cannot be obtained in cases of cardiac arrest. Some studies assessed intravenous versus intraosseous adrenaline administration in OHCA; however, the results seemed to be conflicting. Therefore, here we further performed an updated meta-analysis to evaluate whether intravenous and intraosseous adrenaline administration lead to different outcomes in OHCA.
Participant
Out-hospital cardiac arrestpatients who received prehospital adrenaline.
Animal
Human Disease Modelled
Intervention
intravenous adrenaline administration
Comparator Control
intraosseous adrenaline administration
Main Outcome
prehospital eturn of spontaneous circulation, survival and favorable neurological outcome. Measures of effect The OR was used to denote the results with a 95% CI, indicating the strength of association between treatments and outcomes.
Outcome Measure
Additional Outcome
No Measures of effect No
Study Method
Intervention, Meta-analysis, Systematic review
Keyword
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Epinephrine; Humans; Infusions, Intraosseous; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Contact
Shun Yi Feng [email protected]
Organisational Affiliation
Cangzhou Central Hosptial
Funding Source
No funding sources
Other Selection Criteria
Final Publication
Same Topic Review
Published Protocol
Review Type
Language
English
Country
China
Review Stage
Review Ongoing
First Submission Date
2020-05-03
Registration Date
2020-07-05
Anticipated Start Date
2020-05-10
Anticipated Completion Date
2021-01-01
Title Cn
院外心脏骤停静脉与骨内肾上腺素的比较:Meta分析
Title En
Intravenous versus intraosseous adrenaline administration in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis
Bilingual Status
complete