Meta AnalysisID 914

单注射器与双注射器腺苷给药技术治疗室上性心动过速的系统评价与Meta分析

CRD42022345125

Is the single-syringe technique of adenosine administration more effective than the double-syringe technique for terminating supraventricular tachycardia?

Back to Browse

Relationship Network

Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.

Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...

Record Fields

Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.

Meta Analysis Id
914
Evidence Id
9472
Core Evidence Id
9472
Source Meta Analysis Id
887
Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
HBMA000887
Crd Id
CRD42022345125
Title
The single-syringe versus the double-syringe techniques of adenosine administration for supraventricular tachycardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Review Question
Is the single-syringe technique of adenosine administration more effective than the double-syringe technique for terminating supraventricular tachycardia?
Study Type Included
Randomized controlled trials and observational studies will be included
Condition Being Studied
Given the physical logistic issues and inconvenience of the typical double-syringe adenosine administration for supraventricular tachycardia termination, an alternative method of combining adenosine and normal saline solution flush in a single-syringe administration has been proposed. Although several studies have already tested the feasibility, termination rate, and total administered dose as outcomes of this new method on supraventricular tachycardia patients, there is no meta-analysis on this topic yet, and a definitive assessment of these endpoints is still unclear. Therefore, we aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the feasibility and efficacy of single-syringe adenosine administration in patients with supraventricular tachycardia, specifically interested in end-points such as termination rate, total administered dose, and adverse effects.
Participant
We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the use of single-syringe with double-syringe techniques of adenosine administration in all patients diagnosed with supraventricular tachycardia, reporting the clinical outcomes of interest. We will exclude studies with overlapping patient populations.
Animal
Human Disease Modelled
Intervention
The single-syringe technique of adenosine administration
Comparator Control
The double-syringe technique of adenosine administration
Main Outcome
We will extract data for a pooled analysis on the following outcomes: (1) termination rate, (2) termination rate at first dose, (3) total administered dose, (4) adverse effects, and (5) discharge rate. Measures of effect Risk or odds ratio
Outcome Measure
Additional Outcome
Termination rate, termination rate at first dose, total administered dose, adverse effects, and discharge rate. Measures of effect Risk or odds ratio
Study Method
Intervention, Meta-analysis, Systematic review
Keyword
Adenosine; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Humans; Syringes; Tachycardia, Supraventricular
Contact
Isabele Ayumi Miyawaki [email protected]
Organisational Affiliation
Funding Source
Other Selection Criteria
Final Publication
Same Topic Review
Published Protocol
Review Type
Language
English
Country
United States of America
Review Stage
Review Completed not published
First Submission Date
2022-07-08
Registration Date
2022-07-18
Anticipated Start Date
2022-07-10
Anticipated Completion Date
2022-08-20
Title Cn
单注射器与双注射器腺苷给药技术治疗室上性心动过速的系统评价与Meta分析
Title En
The single-syringe versus the double-syringe techniques of adenosine administration for supraventricular tachycardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bilingual Status
complete