Meta AnalysisID 828

妇科泌尿手术中使用葡萄糖酸氯己定对比聚维酮碘阴道消毒后手术部位感染:一项系统评价与Meta分析

CRD42022378101

Is vaginal preparation with Chlorhexidine gluconate more effective in decreasing rates of surgical site infection than Iodine in vaginal preparation in women undergoing urogynecologic procedures?

Back to Browse

Relationship Network

Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.

Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...

Record Fields

Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.

Meta Analysis Id
828
Evidence Id
9386
Core Evidence Id
9386
Source Meta Analysis Id
800
Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
HBMA000800
Crd Id
CRD42022378101
Title
Surgical site infections after urogynecologic procedures using chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine vaginal antisepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Review Question
Is vaginal preparation with Chlorhexidine gluconate more effective in decreasing rates of surgical site infection than Iodine in vaginal preparation in women undergoing urogynecologic procedures?
Study Type Included
Randomized trials and observational studies.
Condition Being Studied
Postoperative infections are a common complication of urogynecologic procedures. The most common are surgical site infections and urinary tract infection. The effects of these complications include an increase in healthcare costs, increased morbidity, and a higher mortality rate for patients. The vaginal microbiota is known to increase the risk of postoperative infections, hence best practices recommend preoperative antiseptic vaginal cleansing. Chlorhexidine gluconate is the preferred antiseptic for abdominal surgical procedures since it demonstrated fewer postoperative infections when compared to povidone-iodine. In addition, some studies suggest that chlorhexidine's prolonged antiseptic effect is associated with a decreased incidence of infection. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends both chlorhexidine or iodine for preoperative vaginal cleansing. However, iodine is currently the only Food and Drug Administration approved antiseptic agent for vaginal surgeries. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy of chlorhexidine and iodine vaginal cleansing in preventing postoperative infection of urogynecologic surgeries.
Participant
We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing Chlorhexidine with Iodine in women undergoing urogynecologic procedures, reporting the clinical outcomes of interest. We will exclude studies with obstetrical patients and overlapping patient populations.
Animal
Human Disease Modelled
Intervention
Intervention: Vaginal cleansing with Chlorhexidine gluconate, any concentration.
Comparator Control
Control: Vaginal cleansing with Povidone Iodine Solution, any concentration.
Main Outcome
We will extract data for a pooled analysis on the following outcomes: (1) surgical site infections; (2) UTI; (3) postoperative complications. Measures of effect Odds ratio.
Outcome Measure
Additional Outcome
We will collect the following additional outcomes if data is available: (1) Infection not surgically related; (2) Positive colonies; and (3) vaginal culture positive specimens. Measures of effect Odds ratio.
Study Method
Intervention, Meta-analysis, Systematic review
Keyword
Antisepsis; Female; Humans; Iodine; Povidone-Iodine; Surgical Wound Infection; chlorhexidine gluconate
Contact
Yasmin Dias [email protected]
Organisational Affiliation
Funding Source
Other Selection Criteria
Final Publication
Same Topic Review
Published Protocol
Review Type
Language
English
Country
Brazil, United States of America, Wales
Review Stage
Review Ongoing
First Submission Date
2022-11-22
Registration Date
2022-11-23
Anticipated Start Date
2022-11-15
Anticipated Completion Date
2022-12-22
Title Cn
妇科泌尿手术中使用葡萄糖酸氯己定对比聚维酮碘阴道消毒后手术部位感染:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Title En
Surgical site infections after urogynecologic procedures using chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine vaginal antisepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bilingual Status
complete