Meta AnalysisID 7327

使用0.01%阿托品预防近视进展是否值得?一项Meta分析

CRD42023463605

The efficacy and safety of 0.01% atropine in slowing myopia progression and in which ocular conditions (race, myopic refraction, axial length, age, and duration) the drug is more effective.

Back to Browse

Relationship Network

Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.

Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...

Record Fields

Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.

Meta Analysis Id
7327
Evidence Id
15885
Core Evidence Id
15885
Source Meta Analysis Id
7315
Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
HBMA007315
Crd Id
CRD42023463605
Title
Is it worth using 0.01% atropine to prevent myopia progression? A Meta-Analysis
Review Question
The efficacy and safety of 0.01% atropine in slowing myopia progression and in which ocular conditions (race, myopic refraction, axial length, age, and duration) the drug is more effective.
Study Type Included
Randomized controlled trials
Condition Being Studied
The efficacy and safety of low concentration atropine in slowing the progression of myopia has been demonstrated in many clinical studies. At present, 0.01% atropine eye drops are often given to patients by ophthalmologists as a starting concentration, but whether this concentration can really prevent the progression of myopia and reduce the growth of axial length is controversial. It is also unclear which eye condition (race, myopic refraction, axial length, age and duration) is more effective during medication. It is also unclear exactly in which eye condition the medication is more effective. It is therefore necessary to conduct a meta-analysis of relevant RCTs to assess the role of 0.01% atropine in myopia prevention and control.
Participant
Inclusion criteria: Acquired myopia diagnosed by cycloplegic autorefraction Less than 18 years old Exclusion Criteria: Other eye diseases History of eye surgery Medical treatment other than low concentration atropine (e.g. orthokeratology, ) to prevent myopia progression
Animal
Human Disease Modelled
Intervention
0.01% atropine was the main intervention.
Comparator Control
The control group was treated with placebo.
Main Outcome
The changes of ocular axial length and myopic refraction after treatment will be extracted to evaluate the efficacy of 0.01% atropine. The intraocular pressure, amplitude of accommodation, pupil diameter, and adverse effects incidence will be extracted to evaluate the safety of 0.01% atropine.
Outcome Measure
Additional Outcome
Study Method
Meta-analysis, Systematic review
Keyword
MeSH headings have not been applied to this record
Contact
Xinyu Jia [email protected]
Organisational Affiliation
Tianjin Women's and Children's Health Center
Funding Source
Other Selection Criteria
Final Publication
Same Topic Review
Published Protocol
Review Type
Language
Country
China
Review Stage
Review Ongoing
First Submission Date
2023-09-14
Registration Date
2023-09-25
Anticipated Start Date
2023-09-17
Anticipated Completion Date
2024-09-17
Title Cn
使用0.01%阿托品预防近视进展是否值得?一项Meta分析
Title En
Is it worth using 0.01% atropine to prevent myopia progression? A Meta-Analysis
Bilingual Status
complete