Meta AnalysisID 72

泰式传统医学或草药治疗COVID-19的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析

CRD42021274861

Are Thai traditional medicines (TTMs) or herbal medicines therapies effective for treatment of patients confirmed or suspected with COVID-19?

Back to Browse

Relationship Network

Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.

Click a node to open it in a new tab
Herb: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...

Record Fields

Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.

Meta Analysis Id
72
Evidence Id
8630
Core Evidence Id
8630
Source Meta Analysis Id
66
Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
HBMA000066
Crd Id
CRD42021274861
Title
Efficacy and safety of Thai traditional medicine or herbal medicine for treatment of the COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review Question
Are Thai traditional medicines (TTMs) or herbal medicines therapies effective for treatment of patients confirmed or suspected with COVID-19?
Study Type Included
We will include both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs, regardless of level of blinding. We will also include observational study such as pre-post study, case control or cohort study.
Condition Being Studied
Alternative or additive treatments of COVID-19 using Thai traditional medicines or herbal medicines.
Participant
Patients confirmed or suspected with COVID-19, regardless of disease severity, age, gender, setting or previous treatments.
Animal
Human Disease Modelled
Intervention
Any Thai traditional medicine or herbal medicine regimen (monotherapy or combination) that available or widely used in Thailand such as Harak remedy, Turmeric, Kaempfer, Andrographis paniculata or FaThalai Chon (in Thai). We will exclude studies evaluating any Chinese medicine or complementary medicines, nutritional supplements/dietary modifications, or non-pharmacotherapy.
Comparator Control
Any other active drug or placebo/vehicle or supportive care.
Main Outcome
Primary outcomes 1. Proportion of progression to pneumonia 2. Proportion of progression to severe or critical COVID-19 Secondary outcomes 1. Time to test reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) negativity 2. Proportion of patients with RCT-PCR negativity 3. Length of stay at hospital (LoS) 4. Proportion of all-cause death 5. Level of inflammatory marker such as CRP and IL-6 6. Total adverse events 7. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) 8. Withdrawal or dropout from study due to adverse events 9. Renal and liver function test Measurement time: We will assess treatment effects at Day 5 or 7 and Day 10 or 14 after treatment or the end of study. Measures of effect For dichotomous outcomes, we will measure the effect as risk ratios (RR). For continuous outcome, we will measure the effect as mean different (MD).
Outcome Measure
Additional Outcome
None.
Study Method
Intervention, Meta-analysis, Systematic review
Keyword
COVID-19; Herbal Medicine; Humans; Medicine, Traditional; Phytotherapy; Plants, Medicinal; SARS-CoV-2; Thailand
Contact
Ratree Sawangjit [email protected]
Organisational Affiliation
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University
Funding Source
None.
Other Selection Criteria
Final Publication
Same Topic Review
Published Protocol
Review Type
Language
English
Country
Thailand
Review Stage
Review Ongoing
First Submission Date
2021-08-22
Registration Date
2021-08-23
Anticipated Start Date
2021-08-25
Anticipated Completion Date
2022-04-30
Title Cn
泰式传统医学或草药治疗COVID-19的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Title En
Efficacy and safety of Thai traditional medicine or herbal medicine for treatment of the COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bilingual Status
complete