Meta AnalysisID 3930

钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)治疗胃酸相关性疾病的有效性与安全性:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析

CRD42022369570

Is PCAB more effective than PPI or placebo in treating and relieving symptoms of gastric acid-related diseases? Is PCAB safer for gastric acid-related diseases than PPI or placebo?

Back to Browse

Relationship Network

Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.

Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...

Record Fields

Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.

Meta Analysis Id
3930
Evidence Id
12488
Core Evidence Id
12488
Source Meta Analysis Id
3889
Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
HBMA003889
Crd Id
CRD42022369570
Title
The efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CAB) in gastric acid-related disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Review Question
Is PCAB more effective than PPI or placebo in treating and relieving symptoms of gastric acid-related diseases? Is PCAB safer for gastric acid-related diseases than PPI or placebo?
Study Type Included
We will only include RCT studies to assess the beneficial effects of the treatments.
Condition Being Studied
PCABs, a reversible H+-K+ ATPase inhibitor, have a faster and longer-lasting acid suppressive effect, which is not affected by diet and genes polymorphisms. In recent years, there have been many articles presenting the RCT results. Furthermore, non-randomized studies were included in previous meta-analyses, prone to biases and heterogeneity, among other limitations. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis included only robust randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of all studied PCABs. We will update the RCT study result of the latest regimen and assess the efficacy (superiority or non-inferiority) and safety of PCAB compared to PPIs or placebo in treating gastric acid-related diseases.
Participant
Patients with gastric acid-related diseases. Gastric acid-related diseases to be studied in this review included: erosive esophagitis, gastric and duodenal ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Animal
Human Disease Modelled
Intervention
Potassium competitive acid blocker included: Vonoprazan, Soraprazan, Revaprazan, Tegoprazan, Keverprazan and Linaprazan.
Comparator Control
Proton pump inhibitor and placebo
Main Outcome
Upper GI endoscopic measurement of the erosive esophagitis healing rate (proportion) Upper GI endoscopy measurement of the ulcers healing rate (proportion) The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori as assessed by urea breath test, Improvement in GI symptoms Measures of effect The pooled risk ratio (RR) was evaluated for the efficacy outcome
Outcome Measure
Additional Outcome
treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) as the safety outcome. Measures of effect Incidence and Risk Ratio
Study Method
Network meta-analysis, Systematic review
Keyword
Gastric Acid; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Potassium; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Pyrroles
Contact
Mengling Ouyang [email protected]
Organisational Affiliation
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Funding Source
Other Selection Criteria
Final Publication
Same Topic Review
Published Protocol
Review Type
Language
English
Country
China
Review Stage
Review Ongoing
First Submission Date
2022-10-23
Registration Date
2022-11-03
Anticipated Start Date
2022-10-22
Anticipated Completion Date
2023-02-28
Title Cn
钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)治疗胃酸相关性疾病的有效性与安全性:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Title En
The efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CAB) in gastric acid-related disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Bilingual Status
complete