Meta AnalysisID 3674
坦索罗辛和硝苯地平对输尿管结石无效吗？一项系统评价与Meta分析
CRD42015027734
Are tamsulosin and nifedipine not effective for ureteral stones?
Relationship Network
Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.
Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...
Record Fields
Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.
- Meta Analysis Id
- 3674
- Evidence Id
- 12232
- Core Evidence Id
- 12232
- Source Meta Analysis Id
- 3633
- Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
- HBMA003633
- Crd Id
- CRD42015027734
- Title
- Are tamsulosin and nifedipine not effective for ureteral stones? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Review Question
- Are tamsulosin and nifedipine not effective for ureteral stones?
- Study Type Included
- Clinical trials.
- Condition Being Studied
- Urolithiasis is a disease that affects 12% of the world population, and is the cause of a third of urological diseases.
- Participant
- Adults with Ureterolithiasis.
- Animal
- Human Disease Modelled
- Intervention
- Tamsulosin OR Nifedipine
- Comparator Control
- Placebo.
- Main Outcome
- stone clearance
- Outcome Measure
- Additional Outcome
- time to stone passage; analgesic use.
- Study Method
- Keyword
- Humans; Nifedipine; Sulfonamides; Ureteral Calculi; Ureterolithiasis
- Contact
- Mr Glina [email protected]
- Organisational Affiliation
- Funding Source
- Other Selection Criteria
- Final Publication
- Same Topic Review
- Published Protocol
- Review Type
- Language
- English
- Country
- Brazil
- Review Stage
- Review Discontinued
- First Submission Date
- 2022-03-25
- Registration Date
- 2015-10-30
- Anticipated Start Date
- 2015-10-26
- Anticipated Completion Date
- 2015-11-09
- Title Cn
- 坦索罗辛和硝苯地平对输尿管结石无效吗？一项系统评价与Meta分析
- Title En
- Are tamsulosin and nifedipine not effective for ureteral stones? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bilingual Status
- complete