Meta AnalysisID 3608
镍钛螺旋弹簧与弹性链在正畸间隙关闭中的比较：系统评价
CRD42016033529
Is nickel titanium spring more effective than elastomeric chain in closure of premolar extraction space?
Relationship Network
Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.
Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...
Record Fields
Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.
- Meta Analysis Id
- 3608
- Evidence Id
- 12166
- Core Evidence Id
- 12166
- Source Meta Analysis Id
- 3567
- Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
- HBMA003567
- Crd Id
- CRD42016033529
- Title
- Nickel titanium spring vs elastomeric chain in orthodontic space closure: a systematic review
- Review Question
- Is nickel titanium spring more effective than elastomeric chain in closure of premolar extraction space?
- Study Type Included
- Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials, trial with split mouth design.Exclusion criteria:Clinical reports, review articles, opinion articles, animal models and in vitro researches
- Condition Being Studied
- Orthodontic treatment more often requires extraction and premolar is the most commonly extracted tooth. Extraction is followed by space closure which is often performed with sliding or loop mechanics. Force is applied in sliding mechanics by elastomeric chain or nickel titanium coil spring or active ligatures. Elastomeric chain and nickel titanium springs are widely used for space closure in sliding mechanics. This protocol is planned to review the effectiveness of these two methods in orthodontic space closure.
- Participant
- Patients being treated with preadjusted edgewise appliance requiring extraction of premolar and subsequent space closure.
- Animal
- Human Disease Modelled
- Intervention
- Nickel titanium coil spring for space closure. Inclusion criteria: Preadjusted edgewise appliance. Completion of initial levelling and alignment. Upper and lower rigid stainless steel wire placed for at least 4 weeks.
- Comparator Control
- Elastomeric chain for space closure
- Main Outcome
- Rate of space closure Measures of effect The total amount of space closed is divided by the number of months (or 4 weeks) taken for the closure
- Outcome Measure
- Additional Outcome
- Study Method
- Keyword
- Dental Alloys; Elasticity; Humans; Nickel; Orthodontic Space Closure; Titanium
- Contact
- Dr Gyawali [email protected]
- Organisational Affiliation
- Funding Source
- Other Selection Criteria
- Final Publication
- Same Topic Review
- Published Protocol
- Review Type
- Language
- English
- Country
- Nepal
- Review Stage
- Review Ongoing
- First Submission Date
- Registration Date
- 2016-01-24
- Anticipated Start Date
- 2016-01-15
- Anticipated Completion Date
- 2016-06-15
- Title Cn
- 镍钛螺旋弹簧与弹性链在正畸间隙关闭中的比较：系统评价
- Title En
- Nickel titanium spring vs elastomeric chain in orthodontic space closure: a systematic review
- Bilingual Status
- complete