Meta AnalysisID 2719

肝素对比0.9%氯化钠冲管预防儿童肿瘤患者中心静脉导管堵塞的比较

CRD42022336316

the aim of the study is to this study aimed to review the literature on randomized clinical trials that compare heparin versus and 0.9% sodium chloride flushing for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters amo

Back to Browse

Relationship Network

Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.

Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...

Record Fields

Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.

Meta Analysis Id
2719
Evidence Id
11277
Core Evidence Id
11277
Source Meta Analysis Id
2668
Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
HBMA002668
Crd Id
CRD42022336316
Title
Compare heparin versus and 0.9% sodium chloride flushing for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheter among pediatric oncology patient
Review Question
the aim of the study is to this study aimed to review the literature on randomized clinical trials that compare heparin versus and 0.9% sodium chloride flushing for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters among pediatric oncology patients.
Study Type Included
Randomized clinical trials were included. The others were excluded.
Condition Being Studied
the use of central venous catheters (CVC) in the medical care of chronic diseases is increasing and these tools are of great importance in the application of treatment.With the advantages of long-term use, CVCs have become standard care tools used in providing care to pediatric oncology patients by providing comfort. Along with the advantages of using CVC, many complications (occlusion, infection, dislocation, etc.) can be seen as a result of not providing the right care. In the literature, no meta-analysis study has been found comparing the agents used in irrigation to prevent CVC obstruction in pediatric oncology patients. There is a need for a comparison of randomized controlled studies to evaluate the efficacy of the irrigation agent used to prevent CVC obstruction in pediatric oncology patients.
Participant
The study sample consisted of pediatric oncology patients were included. Studies that were not with pediatric oncology patients were excluded.
Animal
Human Disease Modelled
Intervention
Flushing CVC with heparin versus and 0.9% sodium chloride solutions was included. Studies without Flushing CVC with heparin versus and 0.9% sodium chloride solutions were excluded.
Comparator Control
Heparin versus and 0.9% sodium chloride solutions flushing
Main Outcome
The occlusion frequency is main outcome in 1000 days.
Outcome Measure
Additional Outcome
Study Method
Meta-analysis, Systematic review
Keyword
Catheterization, Central Venous; Central Venous Catheters; Child; Heparin; Humans; Neoplasms; Sodium Chloride
Contact
Remziye Semerci [email protected]
Organisational Affiliation
Koç University https://www.ku.edu.tr/
Funding Source
Other Selection Criteria
Final Publication
Same Topic Review
Published Protocol
Review Type
Language
English
Country
Turkey
Review Stage
Review Ongoing
First Submission Date
2022-05-30
Registration Date
2022-06-10
Anticipated Start Date
2022-01-01
Anticipated Completion Date
2022-06-30
Title Cn
肝素对比0.9%氯化钠冲管预防儿童肿瘤患者中心静脉导管堵塞的比较
Title En
Compare heparin versus and 0.9% sodium chloride flushing for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheter among pediatric oncology patient
Bilingual Status
complete