Meta AnalysisID 2352
D-甘露糖对比其他预防药物用于成年女性复发性尿路感染预防：系统评价与Meta分析
CRD42020147578
To provide pooled estimates of research comparing the effects of D-mannose versus other agents in recurrent urinary tract prevention in adult women and to assess relative adverse side effects addressed within these studi
Relationship Network
Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.
Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...
Record Fields
Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.
- Meta Analysis Id
- 2352
- Evidence Id
- 10910
- Core Evidence Id
- 10910
- Source Meta Analysis Id
- 2299
- Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
- HBMA002299
- Crd Id
- CRD42020147578
- Title
- D-mannose vs other prophylactic agents for recurrent urinary tract prevention in adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Review Question
- To provide pooled estimates of research comparing the effects of D-mannose versus other agents in recurrent urinary tract prevention in adult women and to assess relative adverse side effects addressed within these studies.
- Study Type Included
- Metanalysis to include randomized controlled trials and cross-over trials assessing prevention of urinary tract infections in women with D-mannose with a comparator arm. Other original research can be included in the systematic review but will not be included in the metanalysis.
- Condition Being Studied
- Urinary tract infections
- Participant
- Inclusion criteria: a.) Original clinical research for patients receiving care in an outpatient setting for recurrent urinary tract infections (defined as at least 2 in 6 months, at least 3 in 12 months), b) subject age of 18 years or older, c) one of the study arms to include D-mannose as the UTI prevention intervention. Exclusion criteria: a.) lab or animal based research, b.) publications written in languages other than English, c.) duplicate publications, d.) published study protocols, e.) not reporting primary data from original research, f.) subjects do not include adult women.
- Animal
- Human Disease Modelled
- Intervention
- Intervention: D-mannose
- Comparator Control
- Other recurrent urinary tract infection prophylactic agents
- Main Outcome
- Recurrence of urinary tract infection after beginning prophylaxis Measures of effect Relative risk of recurrent urinary tract infection
- Outcome Measure
- Additional Outcome
- Adverse events reported in participants using D-mannose Measures of effect Not applicable
- Study Method
- Intervention, Meta-analysis, Prevention, Systematic review
- Keyword
- Adult; Female; Humans; Mannose; Urinary Tract Infections
- Contact
- Stacy Lenger [email protected]
- Organisational Affiliation
- Washington University in St. Louis
- Funding Source
- Departmental
- Other Selection Criteria
- Final Publication
- https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(20)30604-9/abstract
- Same Topic Review
- Published Protocol
- Review Type
- Language
- English
- Country
- United States of America
- Review Stage
- Review Completed published
- First Submission Date
- 2019-08-17
- Registration Date
- 2020-07-17
- Anticipated Start Date
- 2018-02-05
- Anticipated Completion Date
- 2019-12-31
- Title Cn
- D-甘露糖对比其他预防药物用于成年女性复发性尿路感染预防：系统评价与Meta分析
- Title En
- D-mannose vs other prophylactic agents for recurrent urinary tract prevention in adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Bilingual Status
- complete