Meta AnalysisID 2297

糖尿病中的唾液淀粉酶生物标志物

CRD42021227436

How does salivary amylase levels impact on diagnose of diabetes mellitus compared to glycaemic blood levels?

Back to Browse

Relationship Network

Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.

Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...

Record Fields

Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.

Meta Analysis Id
2297
Evidence Id
10855
Core Evidence Id
10855
Source Meta Analysis Id
2244
Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
HBMA002244
Crd Id
CRD42021227436
Title
Salivary amylase biomarkers in diabetes
Review Question
How does salivary amylase levels impact on diagnose of diabetes mellitus compared to glycaemic blood levels?
Study Type Included
The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled clinical trials (RCCTs),
Condition Being Studied
Diabetes mellitus
Participant
Adults with diabetes mellitus (as diagnosed using any recognised diagnostic criteria).
Animal
Human Disease Modelled
Intervention
with diabetes in humans without exclude of reason of age, sex, or race. Any type of comparison between interventions was considered as valid, as long as one of them consisted in the prescription and application of biomarker diagnostic method, as the case of salivary marker or amylase and blood parameters as the case of glycated haemoglobin or glucose levels .
Comparator Control
The use of another design methods research was not a reason for exclusion, although this was taken into account in the analysis of the data.
Main Outcome
studies in patients with diabetes in humans without exclude of reason of age, sex, or race. Any type of comparison between amylase and DM diagnose was considered as valid, as long as one of them consisted in the prescription and application of biomarker diagnostic method, as the case of salivary marker or amylase and blood parameters as the case of glycated haemoglobin or glucose levels Measures of effect Reasons for exclusion were those studies which did not surpass the eligibility criteria described and/or whose level of methodological quality was doubtful. The risk of bias assessment in the studies was carried out using the tool Review Manager (RevMan) of The Cochrane Library, v.5.3. Likewise, any study selected could have been omitted from the review if, during the data extraction, information had been found which justified its exclusion, such as, in the end, not fulfilling the inclusion criteria defined, or if there were suspicions about the methodological quality used, among others. Studies in which the participants did not have diabetes melitus disease were excluded, as well as those which did not use salivary diagnose.
Outcome Measure
Additional Outcome
None Measures of effect After obtaining them, a complete reading was carried out, again independently, of the documents selected by each of the previous reviewers. In the complete reading, we valued a new their eligibility according to the strict fulfilment of the inclusion criteria originally described, which was necessary for the study to be finally selected for review.
Study Method
Systematic review
Keyword
Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Saliva; alpha-Amylases
Contact
Emmnanuel Navarro-Flores [email protected]
Organisational Affiliation
University of Valencia https://www.uv.es/uvweb/servicio-investigacion/es/ciencias-salud/grupo-1285949713561.html?p2=GIUV2017-398
Funding Source
Universitat de València.
Other Selection Criteria
Final Publication
Same Topic Review
Published Protocol
Review Type
Language
English
Country
Spain
Review Stage
Review Ongoing
First Submission Date
2020-12-21
Registration Date
2021-01-21
Anticipated Start Date
2020-10-08
Anticipated Completion Date
2021-01-28
Title Cn
糖尿病中的唾液淀粉酶生物标志物
Title En
Salivary amylase biomarkers in diabetes
Bilingual Status
complete