Meta AnalysisID 1843

钴铬棒与钛棒治疗脊柱畸形患者的有效性比较:系统评价和Meta分析

CRD42020165985

What is the best rod material to enhance the correction of spinal deformity for patients undergoing posterior instrumentation?

Back to Browse

Relationship Network

Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.

Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...

Record Fields

Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.

Meta Analysis Id
1843
Evidence Id
10401
Core Evidence Id
10401
Source Meta Analysis Id
1785
Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
HBMA001785
Crd Id
CRD42020165985
Title
Comparison of effectiveness between cobalt chromium rods and titanium rods for treatment of patients with spinal deformity. Systemic review and Meta-analysis
Review Question
What is the best rod material to enhance the correction of spinal deformity for patients undergoing posterior instrumentation?
Study Type Included
No restrictions on the types of study
Condition Being Studied
Advanced spinal instrumentation have enabled greater correction of spinal deformities and increased fusion rate though the selection of rods with respective to their mechanical properties still in further studies. Rod material has significant implications on its durability, biocompatibility and artifact production during advance imaging and should be considered carefully. The rates of rod fractures increases with the decreasing fatigue strength of the material being used. Therefore, biomechanical differences in fatigue failure seen in cobalt chromium and titanium rods in posterior spinal fusion has to be well investigated.
Participant
Inclusion criteria (1) Studies comparing the effectiveness of cobalt chromium rods and titanium rods (2) Studies elucidating posterior instrumentation with cobalt chromium or titanium rods for correction of spinal deformity (3)Studies published in English with no restriction (4) No geographic or surgical technique restriction was set. Exclusion criteria (1) Studies based on animal experiment and cadaveric research (2) Studies with another surgical technique (3) Studies published in another language other than English (4) Studies comparing other rods constructs.
Animal
Human Disease Modelled
Intervention
Cobalt chromium rods
Comparator Control
Titanium rods
Main Outcome
1.Correction rate (main curve); Postoperative correction%= ((preoperative full-standing Cobb angle-postoperative full-standing Cobb angle)/ postoperative full-standing Cobb angle) 2. Thoracic kyphosis; Is an abnormally excessive convex curvature of the thoracic spine; measured by a software in a computer preoperative, postoperative and at last follow-up. 3. Lumbar lordosis; Is an increased inward curving of the lumbar spine; measured by a software in a computer preoperative, postoperative and at last follow-up. 4. Rod fracture; Is the most frequent mode of implant failure in long-segment spinal fusion surgery; Noted in postoperative radiography. 5. Fatigue life of rods; the fatigue life of rods measured in number of cycles at maximum compressive loading levels. 6. Proximal junction kyphosis (PJK); Is a postoperative radiographic phenomenon observed in the sagittal plane following instrumentation and fusion for spinal deformity. Measures of effect None
Outcome Measure
Additional Outcome
None Measures of effect None
Study Method
Meta-analysis, Systematic review
Keyword
Chromium; Cobalt; Humans; Scoliosis; Spinal Fusion; Titanium
Contact
Frank Shega [email protected]
Organisational Affiliation
Funding Source
No financial support for this work
Other Selection Criteria
Final Publication
Same Topic Review
Published Protocol
Review Type
Language
English
Country
China, Tanzania
Review Stage
Review Ongoing
First Submission Date
2020-01-19
Registration Date
2020-04-28
Anticipated Start Date
2019-11-04
Anticipated Completion Date
2020-04-10
Title Cn
钴铬棒与钛棒治疗脊柱畸形患者的有效性比较:系统评价和Meta分析
Title En
Comparison of effectiveness between cobalt chromium rods and titanium rods for treatment of patients with spinal deformity. Systemic review and Meta-analysis
Bilingual Status
complete