Meta AnalysisID 1815
对于接受拔牙的患者，使用明胶、纤维素和/或胶原蛋白在愈合结局方面是否存在差异？
CRD42020173528
In patients that underwent dental extractions, are there differences in healing outcomes using gelatin, cellulose and/or collagen?
Relationship Network
Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.
Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...
Record Fields
Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.
- Meta Analysis Id
- 1815
- Evidence Id
- 10373
- Core Evidence Id
- 10373
- Source Meta Analysis Id
- 1760
- Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
- HBMA001760
- Crd Id
- CRD42020173528
- Title
- In patients that underwent dental extractions, are there differences in healing outcomes using gelatin, cellulose and/or collagen?
- Review Question
- In patients that underwent dental extractions, are there differences in healing outcomes using gelatin, cellulose and/or collagen?
- Study Type Included
- We are open to other studies, however randomised control trials will be the focal point
- Condition Being Studied
- Patients undergoing dental extractions experience delayed healing and maybe attributable to multiple factors (eg. comorbidities, medications, trauma, infections, iatrogenic). Numerous methods have been used to promote healing. In the recent times, agents such as gelatin, cellulose, and collagen has been used with promising results. However, there has been no published systematic reviews/meta-analysis to highlight the efficacy of such agents.
- Participant
- Inclusion criteria: Patients that have undergone dental extractions (simple, surgical) Exclusion criteria: N/A
- Animal
- Human Disease Modelled
- Intervention
- The use of gelatin, cellulose and/or collagen that has been placed in dental extraction socket immediately post extraction.
- Comparator Control
- Any of the other agents (eg. plasma rich fibrin or platelets) or placebo
- Main Outcome
- We are assessing healing outcomes (healing time, radiographic success, clinical success where available) Measures of effect Clinical success will be based on percentages of successful healing without complications Radiographic success will be based on percentages of successful healing with radiographic evidence Risk difference will be calculated to determine the difference between two agents
- Outcome Measure
- Additional Outcome
- N/A Measures of effect N/A
- Study Method
- Intervention, Meta-analysis, Systematic review
- Keyword
- Cellulose; Collagen; Gelatin; Humans; Tooth Extraction; Wound Healing
- Contact
- Magdalen Foo [email protected]
- Organisational Affiliation
- University of Western Australia
- Funding Source
- For the purpose of this review, we will be self funding
- Other Selection Criteria
- Final Publication
- Same Topic Review
- Published Protocol
- Review Type
- Language
- English
- Country
- Australia
- Review Stage
- Review Ongoing
- First Submission Date
- 2020-03-13
- Registration Date
- 2020-04-28
- Anticipated Start Date
- 2020-03-13
- Anticipated Completion Date
- 2021-03-13
- Title Cn
- 对于接受拔牙的患者，使用明胶、纤维素和/或胶原蛋白在愈合结局方面是否存在差异？
- Title En
- In patients that underwent dental extractions, are there differences in healing outcomes using gelatin, cellulose and/or collagen?
- Bilingual Status
- complete