Meta AnalysisID 1773
柠檬酸咳嗽反射检测方法的系统评价
CRD42017079055
What are the different methods (i.e. instrumentation and protocols) of citric acid cough reflex testing used in published studies across disciplines?
Relationship Network
Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.
Click a node to open it in a new tab
Ingredient: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...
Record Fields
Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.
- Meta Analysis Id
- 1773
- Evidence Id
- 10331
- Core Evidence Id
- 10331
- Source Meta Analysis Id
- 1718
- Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
- HBMA001718
- Crd Id
- CRD42017079055
- Title
- Systematic review of methods of citric acid cough reflex testing
- Review Question
- What are the different methods (i.e. instrumentation and protocols) of citric acid cough reflex testing used in published studies across disciplines?
- Study Type Included
- All studies, published in peer-reviewed academic journals, that provide a description of citric acid cough reflex testing will be included in the review.
- Condition Being Studied
- Methods of citric acid cough reflex testing, across disciplines.
- Participant
- Inclusion: Studies that involve citric acid cough reflex testing, human studies. Exclusion: Animal studies, cough reflex testing with other tussigneic agents (e.g. capsaicin, tartaric acid).
- Animal
- Human Disease Modelled
- Intervention
- The focus of this review is on methods of citric acid cough reflex testing across disciplines. Any studies that include a description of citric acid cough reflex testing will be included in the review. Cough reflex testing with other tussigneic agents, such as, but not limited, to capsaicin, tartaric acid or fog, will not be included in this review. In addition, the review will be limited to studies on human participants, thus, any animal studies on citric acid cough reflex testing will be excluded. Note: citric acid cough reflex testing is not an intervention or exposure, but used as a clinical test or outcome measure. We are interested in the methods, rather than the results, of this test used across studies in the literature.
- Comparator Control
- In this review, we are interested in the methods of citric acid cough reflex testing used across studies in the literature. We are not comparing one intervention to another. We are interested in reporting the methods (i.e. instrumentation and protocols) used across studies.
- Main Outcome
- (1) Methods of citric acid cough reflex testing (incl. method of inhalation, breathing time, patient interface); (2) Nebuliser and specifications of the nebuliser (particle size, flow rate); (3) Concentrations of citric acid; (4) End of test criteria; (5) Discipline of study; (6) Participants. Our aim is primarily to report and provide an inventory of these methodological components of citric acid cough reflex testing. Measures of effect Not applicable.
- Outcome Measure
- Additional Outcome
- None. Measures of effect Not applicable.
- Study Method
- Systematic review
- Keyword
- Citric Acid; Cough; Humans; Reflex
- Contact
- Emma Wallace [email protected]
- Organisational Affiliation
- University of Canterbury http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/
- Funding Source
- University of Canterbury
- Other Selection Criteria
- Final Publication
- Same Topic Review
- Published Protocol
- Review Type
- Language
- English
- Country
- New Zealand
- Review Stage
- Review Completed not published
- First Submission Date
- 2017-10-22
- Registration Date
- 2017-12-05
- Anticipated Start Date
- 2017-11-01
- Anticipated Completion Date
- 2018-02-28
- Title Cn
- 柠檬酸咳嗽反射检测方法的系统评价
- Title En
- Systematic review of methods of citric acid cough reflex testing
- Bilingual Status
- complete