Meta AnalysisID 148
饮茶与氟中毒风险
CRD42021256517
Does drinking Camellia sinensis teas increase the risk of fluorosis?
Relationship Network
Interactive first-hop connections across herbs, ingredients, formulas, targets, diseases, symptoms, syndromes, evidence, and monographs.
Click a node to open it in a new tab
Herb: 1Meta-analysis: 1Links: 1
Arranging relationship network...
Record Fields
Scalar fields from the final meta_analysis record.
- Meta Analysis Id
- 148
- Evidence Id
- 8706
- Core Evidence Id
- 8706
- Source Meta Analysis Id
- 135
- Herb2 Meta Analysis Id
- HBMA000135
- Crd Id
- CRD42021256517
- Title
- Camellia sinensis teas and the risk of fluorosis
- Review Question
- Does drinking Camellia sinensis teas increase the risk of fluorosis?
- Study Type Included
- Peer reviewed studies. Quantitative randomised controlled trials. Retrospective, prospective, or concurrent cohort studies Cross sectional studies. Relevant studies published in all languages Relevant studies published at any time
- Condition Being Studied
- Fluorosis
- Participant
- Patients up to 18 years of age
- Animal
- Human Disease Modelled
- Intervention
- This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane handbook for systematic review of Interventions (Higgins 2017), following the four-phase diagram of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). The study protocol will be registered with the National Institute of Health Research Database . The research question was adapted from PECO framework to systematically review the clinical studies: Population: Patients up to 18 years Exposition: Camellia sinensis teas Comparison: None Outcome: Fluorosis In terms of research questions, based on the PECO model, our review aimed to assess the current knowledge and literature for the effect of exposition of ground water on the outcome of fluorosis in patients. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria INCLUSION CRITERIA: The following criteria will be followed to include the studies: Studies including patients up to 18 years. Peer reviewed studies. Quantitative randomised controlled trials. Retrospective, prospective, or concurrent cohort studies Cross sectional studies. Relevant studies published in all languages Relevant studies published at any time EXCLUSION CRITERIA: The following studies will be excluded: Qualitative opinions Editorials Literature reviews Expert opinions Newsletters/opinion letters Case reports
- Comparator Control
- Main Outcome
- The developing of fluorosis
- Outcome Measure
- Additional Outcome
- Study Method
- Epidemiologic, Meta-analysis, Systematic review
- Keyword
- Antioxidants; Camellia sinensis; Humans; Tea
- Contact
- Lidia Audrey Rocha Valadas [email protected]
- Organisational Affiliation
- University of Buenos Aires
- Funding Source
- Other Selection Criteria
- Final Publication
- Same Topic Review
- Published Protocol
- Review Type
- Language
- English
- Country
- Argentina
- Review Stage
- Review Ongoing
- First Submission Date
- 2021-05-22
- Registration Date
- 2021-06-21
- Anticipated Start Date
- 2021-05-21
- Anticipated Completion Date
- 2021-12-31
- Title Cn
- 饮茶与氟中毒风险
- Title En
- Camellia sinensis teas and the risk of fluorosis
- Bilingual Status
- complete